I’m baffled by the reaction that Olympic swimmer Amanda Beard has received to her decision to bare it all for the July issue of Playboy magazine. Among them are Sun-Times columnist Carol Slezak who called Beard’s posing “selfish” and former swimming champion John Nabor who said on ESPN’s “Outside the Lines” that it would hurt Beard’s career. Other critics suggest that her appearance in the buff discredits women athletes and hurts her image as a role model to young female swimmers.
Beard defended her position on ESPN and in Playboy saying this was “a business decision” and a “lifetime opportunity.” Beard has appeared in three Olympics and won seven medals, two of them gold. She has already accomplished more in her swimming career than most people will do in their entire lives. If she makes the U.S. Olympic team for the 2008 Beijing Games, Beard will be 26 and likely will make her final appearance on the Olympic scene. She is, as she says, taking advantage of a business opportunity and preparing herself for a career after swimming.
Why do people care so much if women, especially female athletes, pose nude for Playboy? If Beard, or any other female athlete, has the body and the guts to pose in the nude, more power to them. Why should the rest of us criticize their choice?
A Playboy cover won’t take away any of Beard’s Olympic medals nor will it hurt her career, as some critics believe. I’m willing to bet that 10 or 15 years from now, most people won’t even remember the Playboy feature.
No comments:
Post a Comment