Fans of arena football can rejoice: the sport is returning next spring after a one-year absence. The Chicago Rush will also return and will play all their games at the Allstate Arena in Rosemont, IL.
The team will operate under new ownership, Chicago Gridiron, LLC, a group of Chicago-based investors. Mike Hohensee will also return as the head coach, and Ken Valdiserri, who previously worked in the front office for the Chicago Bears and the Chicago White Sox, will act as team president.
The league begins play in April 2010, but no schedule has been announced yet. For details and ticket information, visit the team’s new Web site, www.arenarush.com.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Bears-Hawks Ads Blacked Out by NFL
The National Football League has pulled the plug on an innovative ad campaign (which I wrote about in early October) that was being developed featuring members of the Chicago Blackhawks and Chicago Bears, according to Phil Rosenthal of the Chicago Tribune. The ads were shot in October and were in production when word came down from the league that the ads are a No-Go.
Apparently, the NFL prohibits the use of team marks and logos to promote other sports. That’s too bad. I was really looking forward to seeing the ads featuring Jay Cutler and Jonathon Toews trading passing tips.
The cancelled campaign hurts the Bears more than it does the Hawks, who are the best game in town at the moment. After a subpar performance on the field this season, the Bears could use a little bit of the Hawks’ magic.
Apparently, the NFL prohibits the use of team marks and logos to promote other sports. That’s too bad. I was really looking forward to seeing the ads featuring Jay Cutler and Jonathon Toews trading passing tips.
The cancelled campaign hurts the Bears more than it does the Hawks, who are the best game in town at the moment. After a subpar performance on the field this season, the Bears could use a little bit of the Hawks’ magic.
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
Urlacher Speaks Out, But No One Wants to Hear the Truth
Bears’ linebacker Brian Urlacher has been getting a great deal of flak since speaking out about QB Jay Cutler and the team’s poor play this season. Everyone’s getting upset that Urlacher, who has been out since the season opener with an injury, is picking on Cutler. But anyone who reads his comments more closely will realize that Urlacher wasn’t taking pot shots at Cutler; he was criticizing the Bears organization, coaches and staff.
Urlacher was right about several things. Kyle Orton is not a flashy player, but he still has the ability to win games. He is also correct that the team’s cutlure has changed with the addition of Cutler. In the past, you could always count on the Bears’ running game and defense to win games. That’s how they won Super Bowl XX in 1986. But not anymore. With Cutler at the helm, the running game has all but disappeared, and the Bears' offense is predicated on throwing the ball three-fourths of the time.
The problem is the Bears didn’t bother to provide Cutler with the tools to succeed with this team: good coaching, an effective game plan, a dependable offensive line and receivers. They simply inserted him into the huddle and told him to run the team. When the game plan is predicated on passing three-fourths of the time without the talent to throw to and an offensive line to protect him, you can expect mistakes, especially as opposing defenses know what to expect. And then we all wonder why Cutler has thrown a league-leading 19 interceptions so far this season.
I don’t think this is Cutler’s fault entirely, although certainly he has to take some responsibility. The problem is the system does not work. It hasn’t worked for a long time, not with Orton, not with Rex Grossman, not with Jim Miller, Erik Kramer, Jim Harbaugh or any other quarterback the Bears have put out on the field over the last few decades. And I think the Bears’ organization knows this on some level, but may not know how to fix it.
To contend next season, the Bears will need to clean house, beginning with head coach Lovie Smith and offensive coordinator Ron Turner. Both have had their opportunities to turn this team around, but the fact is, their coaching system does not work. Changing their quarterback coach Pep Hamilton (yes, the Bears do have a QB coach, contrary to some reports) wouldn’t be a bad idea either.
Sadly, with so many changes the Bears need to make and with the quality of talent in the division with the Packers and Vikings, it’s going to take a while before the Bears contend for another division title.
Urlacher was right about several things. Kyle Orton is not a flashy player, but he still has the ability to win games. He is also correct that the team’s cutlure has changed with the addition of Cutler. In the past, you could always count on the Bears’ running game and defense to win games. That’s how they won Super Bowl XX in 1986. But not anymore. With Cutler at the helm, the running game has all but disappeared, and the Bears' offense is predicated on throwing the ball three-fourths of the time.
The problem is the Bears didn’t bother to provide Cutler with the tools to succeed with this team: good coaching, an effective game plan, a dependable offensive line and receivers. They simply inserted him into the huddle and told him to run the team. When the game plan is predicated on passing three-fourths of the time without the talent to throw to and an offensive line to protect him, you can expect mistakes, especially as opposing defenses know what to expect. And then we all wonder why Cutler has thrown a league-leading 19 interceptions so far this season.
I don’t think this is Cutler’s fault entirely, although certainly he has to take some responsibility. The problem is the system does not work. It hasn’t worked for a long time, not with Orton, not with Rex Grossman, not with Jim Miller, Erik Kramer, Jim Harbaugh or any other quarterback the Bears have put out on the field over the last few decades. And I think the Bears’ organization knows this on some level, but may not know how to fix it.
To contend next season, the Bears will need to clean house, beginning with head coach Lovie Smith and offensive coordinator Ron Turner. Both have had their opportunities to turn this team around, but the fact is, their coaching system does not work. Changing their quarterback coach Pep Hamilton (yes, the Bears do have a QB coach, contrary to some reports) wouldn’t be a bad idea either.
Sadly, with so many changes the Bears need to make and with the quality of talent in the division with the Packers and Vikings, it’s going to take a while before the Bears contend for another division title.
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Five Things About Sports to Be Grateful For
It's that time of year again when we pause from our daily activities and give thanks for our many blessings. Even amidst our difficulties, we can always find something to be grateful for. 
While it's been a trying year (to say the least) in the Chicago sports world this past year, here are a few things I'm grateful for (in no particular order):
* The Chicago Blackhawks -- The resurgence of the Hawks is one of the most incredible comeback stories in recent times. Last night, they dominated the San Jose Sharks en route to a 7-2 victory, they currently lead the league in penalty killing, and they've won eight games in a row. Winning the Stanley Cup would be the cream on my pumpkin pie.
* The Chicago youth movement -- Derrek Rose of the Bulls, Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane of the Hawks, Gordon Beckham of the White Sox, and Randy Wells of the Cubs lead the youth movement in Chicago sports. Even while our local teams struggle (except the above mentioned Hawks), these young, talented athletes are fun to watch and give us hope for a brighter future.
* Two Chicago professional baseball teams -- Imagine living in a city that did not have a baseball team, or any professional sports team for that matter. We get so caught up in the on-field play and off season personnel moves, that we forget to appreciate the fact that we HAVE not just one, but two ball clubs to follow throughout the year. Many places in the country don't even have one.
* Universal Sports -- Part of the NBC network, Universal Sports broadcasts Olympic sports. It's nice to have an outlet like Universal to keep up with my other favorites sports, like swimming, gymnsastics and figure skating.
* The Internet -- Where would we all be without the Internet these days? Thanks to the World Wide Web, we can find out everything we want about our favorite sport, team or athlete. It makes blogs like Woman's Eye on Sports possible, and for that I am truly grateful.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Monday, November 23, 2009
Study: Fewer Fouls Called on Home Team
Just as I’m heading out to watch a college basketball game tonight between my alma mater, Illinois State, and the University of Illinois-Chicago, I find this interesting piece on ESPN.com about foul calls in college basketball. It seems a recent study by a couple of college professors finds that the home team often gets fewer fouls called during these games.
The study, which appeared in The Journal of Sports Sciences earlier this year, finds that the chances that the visiting team would get a foul called on them was 7 percent higher than on the home team. When the home team is leading, the probability of the next foul being called on them was 6.3 percent higher than when the home team was trailing. Teams that are leading on nationally televised games also tend to get more fouls called than those leading in locally televised games.
Also, the bigger the difference in called fouls between the two teams, the more likely the next foul would be called against the team with fewer fouls. And when the home team had five or more fouls than the visiting team, there was a 69 percent chance that the visiting team would get the next foul.
While this is all supposedly happening subconsciously by the referees, it is somewhat amusing to realize that there really is something odd going on with the ref calls. And supposedly, it all evens out in the end, although the home team gets a slight edge. All the more reason to root for the home team.
The study, which appeared in The Journal of Sports Sciences earlier this year, finds that the chances that the visiting team would get a foul called on them was 7 percent higher than on the home team. When the home team is leading, the probability of the next foul being called on them was 6.3 percent higher than when the home team was trailing. Teams that are leading on nationally televised games also tend to get more fouls called than those leading in locally televised games.
Also, the bigger the difference in called fouls between the two teams, the more likely the next foul would be called against the team with fewer fouls. And when the home team had five or more fouls than the visiting team, there was a 69 percent chance that the visiting team would get the next foul.
While this is all supposedly happening subconsciously by the referees, it is somewhat amusing to realize that there really is something odd going on with the ref calls. And supposedly, it all evens out in the end, although the home team gets a slight edge. All the more reason to root for the home team.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Beckham Settles for Fifth in ROY Voting
Several weeks ago, White Sox infielder Gordon Beckham was named the Players Choice and the Sporting News Rookie of the Year, both based on the opinions of fellow baseball players. Today, he had a chance to win the trifecta when the Baseball Writers of America voted. Not only did Beckham not win Rookie of the Year honors, he placed a distant fifth, garnering only two second-place votes and four third-place votes.
Why the discrepancy? I’m still scratching my head over this one. Kinda makes you wonder what the baseball writers were looking at.
Instead the writers chose Oakland A's reliever Andrew Bailey who had 26 saves with a 1.84 ERA. Great numbers, I must admit. But I think Beckham's play made more of a difference for the White Sox, who were divisional contenders for most of the summer.
I can understand it if Beckham finished a close second, but a distant fifth with only six votes after nabbing top honors by his peers is something that's difficult to understand. Perhaps it’s a case of the writers looking at Beckham’s two previous honors, assuming that other writes will vote for him, and decide to vote for someone else.
Beckham’s numbers were just as good, if not better, than the other top rookies in consideration. After being promoted from Triple A in early June, Beckham went on to lead all AL rookies with 28 doubles, 43 extra-base hits and 63 RBIs in just 103 games, while finishing second in home runs (14), runs scored (58), hits (102), on-base percentage (.347), slugging percentage (.460) and total bases (174).
Those are impressive numbers. But they clearly did not impress enough of the baseball writers.
Why the discrepancy? I’m still scratching my head over this one. Kinda makes you wonder what the baseball writers were looking at.
Instead the writers chose Oakland A's reliever Andrew Bailey who had 26 saves with a 1.84 ERA. Great numbers, I must admit. But I think Beckham's play made more of a difference for the White Sox, who were divisional contenders for most of the summer.
I can understand it if Beckham finished a close second, but a distant fifth with only six votes after nabbing top honors by his peers is something that's difficult to understand. Perhaps it’s a case of the writers looking at Beckham’s two previous honors, assuming that other writes will vote for him, and decide to vote for someone else.
Beckham’s numbers were just as good, if not better, than the other top rookies in consideration. After being promoted from Triple A in early June, Beckham went on to lead all AL rookies with 28 doubles, 43 extra-base hits and 63 RBIs in just 103 games, while finishing second in home runs (14), runs scored (58), hits (102), on-base percentage (.347), slugging percentage (.460) and total bases (174).
Those are impressive numbers. But they clearly did not impress enough of the baseball writers.
Saturday, November 07, 2009
Breaking Down the Mark Teahan Trade
It's official now. The White Sox announced they have acquired OF/IF Mark Teahan from the Kansas City Royals in exchange for 3B Josh Fields and 2B Chris Getz.
At first glance, I was surprised that Getz was part of this deal as GM Kenny Williams has repeatedly said the team needed more youth and speed. Getz was an average player offensively, but his speed on the base pads cannot be overlooked. He stole 25 bases last season in 27 attempts, a better percentage than Scott Podsednik. I had visions of Getz becoming a lead off hitter if he could work the bat better. Still, Getz just concluded his first full season with the Sox and was hampered by injuries in each of the last two seasons. His durability and inconsistent performance at the plate may have been a concern.
Teahan is a versatile player, and he has played second and third base as well as the outfield. He's only 28 and has been in the league about five seasons, so he brings more experience to the infield, which the Sox need. He batted .271 for Kansas City last season, but batted .277 against the Sox, which might be another reason why they wanted the guy on their side.
The Sox plan to put Teahan at third, his natural position, and move the talented Gordon Beckham over to second base. Beckham played some second base during the Arizona Fall League and with time, he should do well. He's a fast learner and should pick up the position quickly.
Fields had a stellar year at third base in 2007 after Joe Crede had back surgery, but never quite played at the same level since then. He played mostly in the minors in 2008 during Crede's final year, and struggled early last season before losing the job to Beckham. Fields was sent to the minors mid season amidst speculation that he would soon be traded before the July 30 trade deadline. While his stint in Chicago overall was not memorable, Fields will be remembered for hitting a grand slam in Mark Buehrle's perfect game last July.
Despite losing Getz, which could come back to haunt the Sox down the road, this deal could work out well for both teams.
At first glance, I was surprised that Getz was part of this deal as GM Kenny Williams has repeatedly said the team needed more youth and speed. Getz was an average player offensively, but his speed on the base pads cannot be overlooked. He stole 25 bases last season in 27 attempts, a better percentage than Scott Podsednik. I had visions of Getz becoming a lead off hitter if he could work the bat better. Still, Getz just concluded his first full season with the Sox and was hampered by injuries in each of the last two seasons. His durability and inconsistent performance at the plate may have been a concern.
Teahan is a versatile player, and he has played second and third base as well as the outfield. He's only 28 and has been in the league about five seasons, so he brings more experience to the infield, which the Sox need. He batted .271 for Kansas City last season, but batted .277 against the Sox, which might be another reason why they wanted the guy on their side.
The Sox plan to put Teahan at third, his natural position, and move the talented Gordon Beckham over to second base. Beckham played some second base during the Arizona Fall League and with time, he should do well. He's a fast learner and should pick up the position quickly.
Fields had a stellar year at third base in 2007 after Joe Crede had back surgery, but never quite played at the same level since then. He played mostly in the minors in 2008 during Crede's final year, and struggled early last season before losing the job to Beckham. Fields was sent to the minors mid season amidst speculation that he would soon be traded before the July 30 trade deadline. While his stint in Chicago overall was not memorable, Fields will be remembered for hitting a grand slam in Mark Buehrle's perfect game last July.
Despite losing Getz, which could come back to haunt the Sox down the road, this deal could work out well for both teams.
Monday, November 02, 2009
Memories of "Sweetness"
It's hard to believe that it's been 10 years since Walter Payton died of liver cancer. To commemorate this anniversary, the Chicago Bears honored "Sweetness" during half-time of Sunday's game at Soldier Field. You can watch the video of the tribute on the Bears' Web site.
I have a few of my own memories of Walter Payton. During the mid 1980s, a friend and I made several trips to the Bears' summer camp facility in Platteville, Wis., to watch the team's practices. I have only one photo of Payton from those trips. Yes, that's Walter in yellow lightheartedly brandishing a golf club to ward off fans as he got into a car. This was about as close as I would ever get to football's greatest running back.
I have a few of my own memories of Walter Payton. During the mid 1980s, a friend and I made several trips to the Bears' summer camp facility in Platteville, Wis., to watch the team's practices. I have only one photo of Payton from those trips. Yes, that's Walter in yellow lightheartedly brandishing a golf club to ward off fans as he got into a car. This was about as close as I would ever get to football's greatest running back.We miss you, #34.
Thursday, October 15, 2009
MLB Championship Series Preview
The MLB championship series are set to begin tonight with the New York Yankees facing the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, and the Los Angeles Dodgers hosting defending champion Philadelphia Phillies. I expect both series to be exciting and closely-fought matches. But as we all know, there can only be one winner.
ALCS - While the Yankees are the sexy choice here with their all-star lineup that can hit almost at will, I like the Angels. I think they are a better-rounded team with a lot of pitching depth. The Yankees’ back of the rotation is suspect, which could be problematic in a long, seven-game series. Also, the Angels have an intangible. The death early in the season of pitcher Nick Adenhart has unified this team. I think that experience, plus overcoming a slow start with injuries to three of their starting pitchers, has made them an emotionally strong team. If any team can get past the Yankees, the Angels can.
NLCS - The NLCS is a tougher call. Like the Yankees, the Dodgers are the sexy choice with their young starters. But they struggled down the stretch and nearly lost their division title. The Phillies also struggled and Brad Lidge is a big question mark as their closer. Still, he performed well in the NLDS. I also like the way the Phillies came back against the Rockies in Game 4 to clinch the series, and I like their lineup. They know how to win the big games. I’m not convinced the Dodgers are able to do that.
So, I guess I’m going against all expert prognosticators with my pick: Angels and Phillies.
ALCS - While the Yankees are the sexy choice here with their all-star lineup that can hit almost at will, I like the Angels. I think they are a better-rounded team with a lot of pitching depth. The Yankees’ back of the rotation is suspect, which could be problematic in a long, seven-game series. Also, the Angels have an intangible. The death early in the season of pitcher Nick Adenhart has unified this team. I think that experience, plus overcoming a slow start with injuries to three of their starting pitchers, has made them an emotionally strong team. If any team can get past the Yankees, the Angels can.
NLCS - The NLCS is a tougher call. Like the Yankees, the Dodgers are the sexy choice with their young starters. But they struggled down the stretch and nearly lost their division title. The Phillies also struggled and Brad Lidge is a big question mark as their closer. Still, he performed well in the NLDS. I also like the way the Phillies came back against the Rockies in Game 4 to clinch the series, and I like their lineup. They know how to win the big games. I’m not convinced the Dodgers are able to do that.
So, I guess I’m going against all expert prognosticators with my pick: Angels and Phillies.
Bears, Hawks Launch Ad Campaign
I’m eager to see the new series of ads that will promote the Chicago Bears and Chicago Blackhawks. The ads, which will begin airing in a few weeks, will feature members of both teams in various scenarios. For example, Bears’ quarterback Jay Cutler and Hawks’ captain Jonathan Toews exchange tips on passing.
The ad campaign is unique in that the teams are aligning their brands to reach their fan base, something they apparently share. According to a Chicago Tribune story, 92 percent of hockey fans are also football fans.
The Hawks wanted to reach out to this fan base and approached the Bears to see if they were interested. They even offered to foot the bill for production and air time. The Bears have nothing to lose since they are already well-known worldwide. The Hawks, on the other hand, are trying to capitalize on the buzz they created last year when they surpassed everyone’s expectations in reaching the NHL’s Western Conference finals before losing to the Detroit Red Wings.
If these ads do well, I’m willing to bet the other teams in town -- the Cubs, White Sox, Bulls and Fire – will look to join forces to cross-promote their brands.
The ad campaign is unique in that the teams are aligning their brands to reach their fan base, something they apparently share. According to a Chicago Tribune story, 92 percent of hockey fans are also football fans.
The Hawks wanted to reach out to this fan base and approached the Bears to see if they were interested. They even offered to foot the bill for production and air time. The Bears have nothing to lose since they are already well-known worldwide. The Hawks, on the other hand, are trying to capitalize on the buzz they created last year when they surpassed everyone’s expectations in reaching the NHL’s Western Conference finals before losing to the Detroit Red Wings.
If these ads do well, I’m willing to bet the other teams in town -- the Cubs, White Sox, Bulls and Fire – will look to join forces to cross-promote their brands.
Monday, October 12, 2009
Orton's Success Should Come as No Surprise
Bears fans who watched the Denver Broncos’ overtime victory over New England yesterday are probably wondering, “Why couldn’t Kyle Orton have played this way when he was with the Bears?”
While I’m as surprised as everyone else that the Broncos are unbeaten at 5-0, I’m not as surprised to see Orton perform as well as he has. In my blog last April after the Orton-Cutler trade, I wondered if Orton would have enjoyed better success in Chicago if he had better receivers to throw to, a younger, quicker offensive line to protect him, and a game plan that featured his strengths as a quarterback.
During his three years in Chicago, Orton was much maligned and underrated. Yet, for all his flaws, he posted a 21-12 career record with the Bears and had a .667 regular season winning percentage, the fourth highest among Bears quarterbacks since 1961. Being traded to Denver in the offseason provided the perfect opportunity to jumpstart his career. Now he has a chance to play every week with many of the players and offensive schemes that helped Cutler be so successful last season.
While it’s still early in the 2009 football campaign, it appears that this trade has worked out well so far for all parties. Cutler’s talents and leadership on the field is forcing the rest of the Bears team, especially the receivers, to raise their game to his level. Meanwhile, Orton, who went to a team with many offensive weapons already in place, has raised his game to match theirs.
If Orton’s performance so far this season proves anything, it’s this: Football is still a team sport. Winning depends on having a balanced attack: offense, defense, special teams and coaching. When all these elements are in place, you don’t need to be the most talented quarterback on the block to win in the National Football League. You just have to be a smart one.
While I’m as surprised as everyone else that the Broncos are unbeaten at 5-0, I’m not as surprised to see Orton perform as well as he has. In my blog last April after the Orton-Cutler trade, I wondered if Orton would have enjoyed better success in Chicago if he had better receivers to throw to, a younger, quicker offensive line to protect him, and a game plan that featured his strengths as a quarterback.
During his three years in Chicago, Orton was much maligned and underrated. Yet, for all his flaws, he posted a 21-12 career record with the Bears and had a .667 regular season winning percentage, the fourth highest among Bears quarterbacks since 1961. Being traded to Denver in the offseason provided the perfect opportunity to jumpstart his career. Now he has a chance to play every week with many of the players and offensive schemes that helped Cutler be so successful last season.
While it’s still early in the 2009 football campaign, it appears that this trade has worked out well so far for all parties. Cutler’s talents and leadership on the field is forcing the rest of the Bears team, especially the receivers, to raise their game to his level. Meanwhile, Orton, who went to a team with many offensive weapons already in place, has raised his game to match theirs.
If Orton’s performance so far this season proves anything, it’s this: Football is still a team sport. Winning depends on having a balanced attack: offense, defense, special teams and coaching. When all these elements are in place, you don’t need to be the most talented quarterback on the block to win in the National Football League. You just have to be a smart one.
Thursday, October 08, 2009
Michael Vick Lands TV Gig
After spending 18 months in jail for running a dog-fighting ring, Michael Vick returned to the NFL as a backup QB with the Philadelphia Eagles. Now he’s landed a new gig – a reality TV show for the BET network, according to Foxsports.com. The eight-part series called “The Michael Vick Project” will follow Vick’s comeback in the NFL and document his past, including the 2007 arrest for running a dog-fighting ring.
According to the story, Vick says he is doing this to “change the perception of me” so people can know him as an individual.
Many of Vick’s supporters say the show can help Vick set the record straight and put the past behind him. But if Vick is serious about doing that, why do a reality TV show that may only shed more light on the dog-fighting controversy? Instead, why not appear in a series of public service announcements that show the dangers of dog fighting or how to fight animal abuse?
For someone who committed a crime, Vick has gotten a pretty good deal. Not only has the NFL welcomed him back into the fold, he also gets his own TV show, which will do more for Vick’s career but very little to help the animal abuse cause. If Vick really wants to prove that he is a decent human being, then he needs to focus more on helping the cause and less on helping himself.
According to the story, Vick says he is doing this to “change the perception of me” so people can know him as an individual.
Many of Vick’s supporters say the show can help Vick set the record straight and put the past behind him. But if Vick is serious about doing that, why do a reality TV show that may only shed more light on the dog-fighting controversy? Instead, why not appear in a series of public service announcements that show the dangers of dog fighting or how to fight animal abuse?
For someone who committed a crime, Vick has gotten a pretty good deal. Not only has the NFL welcomed him back into the fold, he also gets his own TV show, which will do more for Vick’s career but very little to help the animal abuse cause. If Vick really wants to prove that he is a decent human being, then he needs to focus more on helping the cause and less on helping himself.
Monday, October 05, 2009
Pitching Is Key to Sox' Success in 2010
Sox GM Kenny Williams won’t admit it, but this was really a rebuilding year for the White Sox. After losing Orlando Cabrera and Joe Crede to free agency in the offseason and trading Nick Swisher to the Yankees and Javier Vasquez to Atlanta, the Sox committed themselves to building a younger, faster team. But in the process, they went through some growing pains with their young infielders, and went through what seemed like a season long hitting slump. In the end, the Sox finished third in the AL Central with a 79-83 record. Not what the Sox expected at the start of the 2009 campaign, but not bad considering what they were dealing with this year and better than the last-place finish Baseball Prospectus predicted.
While the Sox did not perform as well as many fans hoped, there are enough good things in this team to make a decent run for a division title in 2010. It starts with pitching. If the past few starts by Jake Peavy and Freddie Garcia are any indication, then the Sox will have one of the best starting rotations in the American League. And I include Garcia in the mix because he has consistently given the Sox quality starts and could win as many as 12 to 15 games if he gets enough run support. Peavy was outstanding in his last outing against the Tigers Friday night, going eight innings and giving up only two hits. That’s the stuff World Series dreams are made of. Add a stronger bullpen, timely hitting and strong defense, and the White Sox should rebound from their lackluster 2009 effort.
While the Sox did not perform as well as many fans hoped, there are enough good things in this team to make a decent run for a division title in 2010. It starts with pitching. If the past few starts by Jake Peavy and Freddie Garcia are any indication, then the Sox will have one of the best starting rotations in the American League. And I include Garcia in the mix because he has consistently given the Sox quality starts and could win as many as 12 to 15 games if he gets enough run support. Peavy was outstanding in his last outing against the Tigers Friday night, going eight innings and giving up only two hits. That’s the stuff World Series dreams are made of. Add a stronger bullpen, timely hitting and strong defense, and the White Sox should rebound from their lackluster 2009 effort.
Chicago’s Olympic Bid Doomed from the Start
I suggested in my post last Friday that the rather contentious relationship between the IOC and the U.S. Olympic Committee could be a contributing factor in Chicago’s failed bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics, and it appears I was right. Phil Hersh of the Chicago Tribune does a nice job of explaining what happened here and here.
Based on what I’ve read, it seems Chicago’s bid was doomed from the start and that many of the IOC members had made up their minds long before the final presentations were made. There was nothing that the bid committee or President Obama could say or do to change the course of things.
It is clear the USOC is in a shambles. Until it can get its act together and resolve its differences with the IOC, I see no point in putting forth any future bids by American cities to host the Olympic Games.
Based on what I’ve read, it seems Chicago’s bid was doomed from the start and that many of the IOC members had made up their minds long before the final presentations were made. There was nothing that the bid committee or President Obama could say or do to change the course of things.
It is clear the USOC is in a shambles. Until it can get its act together and resolve its differences with the IOC, I see no point in putting forth any future bids by American cities to host the Olympic Games.
Friday, October 02, 2009
Why Chicago’s Olympic Bid Failed
For the first time ever, a South American city will host the Olympics. Today, Rio de Janeiro was named the host city of the 2016 Summer Olympic Games. The path to the top was paved for Rio when Chicago, considered to be Rio’s closest competition, was eliminated in the first round of voting.
Technically, Chicago’s bid was very strong by all accounts, perhaps the strongest ever by any American city. So why did Chicago lose the bid? Why was the city eliminated in the first round while earning only 18 votes by IOC members? I have several theories, and they have nothing to do with President Obama’s inability to sway voters or with Michael Jordan not appearing in Copenhagen.
Lack of focus. Chicago’s bid had no central theme or purpose to rally around. The final presentation did not provide IOC members with a strong, compelling reason why Chicago should host the Olympics. And it failed to show what kind of legacy the Games would leave behind to help local communities.
On the other hand, Rio’s bid team repeatedly reminded IOC members that the Olympic Games had never been held in South America, and Rio was ready to host them. That message apparently resonated with IOC voters.
Lack of public support. A Tribune poll in August showed only 47 percent of Chicagoans wanted the city to host the Olympic Games, down from more than 60 percent in February. IOC members generally do not award the Games to cities where public support is low. That may have been the case with Chicago’s bid.
USOC issues. The U.S. Olympic Committee has several lingering conflicts with the IOC, including the U.S. share of revenue from the Games and the USOC’s recent announcement that they would launch an Olympic network. Both parties have agreed to table these issues until after the 2016 bid city was announced. In addition, the USOC appears to be somewhat unstable after several changes in USOC leadership and cutbacks in operations earlier this year, which might have hampered Chicago’s bid.
Lack of visibility. While the city’s bid effort introduced Chicago to many IOC members who were unfamiliar with the city, Chicago’s remains relatively unknown compared to the other bid cities. IOC members are not allowed to visit the bidding cities on their own, so they must rely on the presentations and bid books to become familiar with the bid city. IOC members may have preferred to give the Games to a city they are more familiar with.
Lack of experience with Olympic bidding process. This is Chicago’s first bid attempt, and their lack of experience showed at times. Chicago made a few mistakes along the way, such as creating their initial logo without consulting IOC rules governing symbol usage. The committee had to scrap the logo and create a new one. The other bid cities have gone through the bid process before and know what to expect, know what buttons to push. Both Rio and Madrid submitted bids for the 2012 Games and lost out to eventual winner London. Tokyo has hosted the Games before.
U.S. reputation. It is no secret that the United States has an image problem with the rest of the world. Despite the election of President Obama, the U.S. is still not well liked or trusted in many parts of the world. I wonder how much of that distrust carried over into the IOC’s decision.
Ultimately, the reason Chicago did not win its bid to host the 2016 Olympic Games is because Rio de Janeiro presented a better, more compelling case why they should host the Games.
Go ahead. Blame it on Rio.
Technically, Chicago’s bid was very strong by all accounts, perhaps the strongest ever by any American city. So why did Chicago lose the bid? Why was the city eliminated in the first round while earning only 18 votes by IOC members? I have several theories, and they have nothing to do with President Obama’s inability to sway voters or with Michael Jordan not appearing in Copenhagen.
Lack of focus. Chicago’s bid had no central theme or purpose to rally around. The final presentation did not provide IOC members with a strong, compelling reason why Chicago should host the Olympics. And it failed to show what kind of legacy the Games would leave behind to help local communities.
On the other hand, Rio’s bid team repeatedly reminded IOC members that the Olympic Games had never been held in South America, and Rio was ready to host them. That message apparently resonated with IOC voters.
Lack of public support. A Tribune poll in August showed only 47 percent of Chicagoans wanted the city to host the Olympic Games, down from more than 60 percent in February. IOC members generally do not award the Games to cities where public support is low. That may have been the case with Chicago’s bid.
USOC issues. The U.S. Olympic Committee has several lingering conflicts with the IOC, including the U.S. share of revenue from the Games and the USOC’s recent announcement that they would launch an Olympic network. Both parties have agreed to table these issues until after the 2016 bid city was announced. In addition, the USOC appears to be somewhat unstable after several changes in USOC leadership and cutbacks in operations earlier this year, which might have hampered Chicago’s bid.
Lack of visibility. While the city’s bid effort introduced Chicago to many IOC members who were unfamiliar with the city, Chicago’s remains relatively unknown compared to the other bid cities. IOC members are not allowed to visit the bidding cities on their own, so they must rely on the presentations and bid books to become familiar with the bid city. IOC members may have preferred to give the Games to a city they are more familiar with.
Lack of experience with Olympic bidding process. This is Chicago’s first bid attempt, and their lack of experience showed at times. Chicago made a few mistakes along the way, such as creating their initial logo without consulting IOC rules governing symbol usage. The committee had to scrap the logo and create a new one. The other bid cities have gone through the bid process before and know what to expect, know what buttons to push. Both Rio and Madrid submitted bids for the 2012 Games and lost out to eventual winner London. Tokyo has hosted the Games before.
U.S. reputation. It is no secret that the United States has an image problem with the rest of the world. Despite the election of President Obama, the U.S. is still not well liked or trusted in many parts of the world. I wonder how much of that distrust carried over into the IOC’s decision.
Ultimately, the reason Chicago did not win its bid to host the 2016 Olympic Games is because Rio de Janeiro presented a better, more compelling case why they should host the Games.
Go ahead. Blame it on Rio.
Thursday, October 01, 2009
Final Countdown Begins for Olympic Bid Cities
The clock is ticking.
In less than 24 hours, members of the International Olympic Committee will decide which of four bid cities will host the 2016 Summer Olympic Games: Tokyo, Madrid, Rio de Janeiro and Chicago. While each bid city has presented strong cases for hosting the Olympic Games, the general consensus is that this race is oh-so-close, with Rio and Chicago being the leading contenders.
After reading the Chicago Tribune’s succinct summary of why each bid city could win or lose the Olympic bid, I think Chicago’s chances are quite good. Rio is a strong contender and presents an emotional case, but I don’t think they are quite ready logistically to handle the Games. Their budget of $14.4 billion is much higher because the infrastructure is not yet in place. They have more venues to build, and the Games will be more spread out, which means they need to build the roads and transportation. With so much work to do, Rio may be a risky choice.
Even more troubling is the level of crime, as Tribune column Phil Hersh described recently in his Globetrotting blog. Granted, Chicago has crime issues too, but they don't compare with what is happening in Rio. These crime and infrastructure issues could be big enough concerns that they could hurt Rio’s chances to win the Games.
We'll know for sure in less than 24 hours.
In less than 24 hours, members of the International Olympic Committee will decide which of four bid cities will host the 2016 Summer Olympic Games: Tokyo, Madrid, Rio de Janeiro and Chicago. While each bid city has presented strong cases for hosting the Olympic Games, the general consensus is that this race is oh-so-close, with Rio and Chicago being the leading contenders.
After reading the Chicago Tribune’s succinct summary of why each bid city could win or lose the Olympic bid, I think Chicago’s chances are quite good. Rio is a strong contender and presents an emotional case, but I don’t think they are quite ready logistically to handle the Games. Their budget of $14.4 billion is much higher because the infrastructure is not yet in place. They have more venues to build, and the Games will be more spread out, which means they need to build the roads and transportation. With so much work to do, Rio may be a risky choice.
Even more troubling is the level of crime, as Tribune column Phil Hersh described recently in his Globetrotting blog. Granted, Chicago has crime issues too, but they don't compare with what is happening in Rio. These crime and infrastructure issues could be big enough concerns that they could hurt Rio’s chances to win the Games.
We'll know for sure in less than 24 hours.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Milton Bradley Gone for Good?
Cubs’ GM Jim Hendry finally pulled the plug on Milton Bradley Sunday, suspending the disgruntled outfielder for the remainder of the season after Bradley criticized the team in a Daily Herald article.
But it was clear early on that Bradley was a poor fit for the Cubs. He didn’t play well to start the season. He had miscues in the field, was suspended for arguing with an umpire and criticized Chicago fans. And as the season wore on and the Cubs fell further behind in the NL Central, Bradley seemed to get even more restless and critical. Hendry had seen enough and put Bradley on the shelf – possibly for good.
It’s highly unusual for a team to suspend a player for the rest of the season, when there are two weeks remaining. The fact that the Cubs have done this shows how desperate they are to end the Milton Bradley experiment. The Cubs are Bradley’s eighth team in nine years in the big leagues. Doesn’t it make you wonder why he can’t stick with any one team for too long?
In hindsight, maybe the Cubs should have done something sooner with Bradley – suspension or trade or something – to get him out of the clubhouse. But I guess when you have $30 million invested in a player, you want to be patient and give him time to adjust to the team and perhaps come around on his own.
So what next? Do the Cubs take the loss and let him go? Or will they be able to work out a trade? And with all the well-publicized baggage Bradley carries, would any team want him?
There is no doubt in my mind that Bradley will not return to Wrigley Field next season. It’s clear he’s been looking for a way out almost since the day he walked into the clubhouse. And the Cubs should do all they can to give him a one-way ticket out of town.
But it was clear early on that Bradley was a poor fit for the Cubs. He didn’t play well to start the season. He had miscues in the field, was suspended for arguing with an umpire and criticized Chicago fans. And as the season wore on and the Cubs fell further behind in the NL Central, Bradley seemed to get even more restless and critical. Hendry had seen enough and put Bradley on the shelf – possibly for good.
It’s highly unusual for a team to suspend a player for the rest of the season, when there are two weeks remaining. The fact that the Cubs have done this shows how desperate they are to end the Milton Bradley experiment. The Cubs are Bradley’s eighth team in nine years in the big leagues. Doesn’t it make you wonder why he can’t stick with any one team for too long?
In hindsight, maybe the Cubs should have done something sooner with Bradley – suspension or trade or something – to get him out of the clubhouse. But I guess when you have $30 million invested in a player, you want to be patient and give him time to adjust to the team and perhaps come around on his own.
So what next? Do the Cubs take the loss and let him go? Or will they be able to work out a trade? And with all the well-publicized baggage Bradley carries, would any team want him?
There is no doubt in my mind that Bradley will not return to Wrigley Field next season. It’s clear he’s been looking for a way out almost since the day he walked into the clubhouse. And the Cubs should do all they can to give him a one-way ticket out of town.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Good-bye to the Coin Flip; Play-In Game Could Be Next
If you were waiting to find out which major league teams currently in contention would host a potential one-game playoff, you’ll have to wait until the end of the regular season. MLB GMs decided last November to eliminate the coin flip, which in the past determined which team would host a one-game playoff in the event of a tie.
Instead, the host team will be decided by a series of on-field tiebreakers, beginning with head-to-head records. If that’s tied, the next tiebreaker is the team with the highest winning percentage within the division, followed by the highest winning percentage in intra-league play during the second half of the season.
I like the change and I believe it’s an improvement over the coin flip, which seemed arbitrary and pointless. However, with three levels of on-field tiebreakers, why bother playing a tiebreaker game at all?
I know the play-in game is supposed to help generate excitement for the playoffs. But under this new system, a play-in game seems obsolete. Think about it. If two teams have the same record, but team A has the season record over team B, wouldn’t it make sense to name Team A the divisional winner without having a tiebreaker game? Why should Team A be expected to play Game 163 to prove that they are indeed the divisional winner when they already have the proven that they are the better team in the division by having the season record against their rival?
Further, what happens if Team A hosts a tiebreaker game and loses to Team B? Team A would probably feel cheated out of a division title. How many times would this scenario have to play out before owners and GMs decide the play-in game isn't such a great idea afterall.
Eliminating the coin flip is a step in the right direction, but there's more work to be done. Time will tell if the tiebreaker play-in game stands the test of time.
Instead, the host team will be decided by a series of on-field tiebreakers, beginning with head-to-head records. If that’s tied, the next tiebreaker is the team with the highest winning percentage within the division, followed by the highest winning percentage in intra-league play during the second half of the season.
I like the change and I believe it’s an improvement over the coin flip, which seemed arbitrary and pointless. However, with three levels of on-field tiebreakers, why bother playing a tiebreaker game at all?
I know the play-in game is supposed to help generate excitement for the playoffs. But under this new system, a play-in game seems obsolete. Think about it. If two teams have the same record, but team A has the season record over team B, wouldn’t it make sense to name Team A the divisional winner without having a tiebreaker game? Why should Team A be expected to play Game 163 to prove that they are indeed the divisional winner when they already have the proven that they are the better team in the division by having the season record against their rival?
Further, what happens if Team A hosts a tiebreaker game and loses to Team B? Team A would probably feel cheated out of a division title. How many times would this scenario have to play out before owners and GMs decide the play-in game isn't such a great idea afterall.
Eliminating the coin flip is a step in the right direction, but there's more work to be done. Time will tell if the tiebreaker play-in game stands the test of time.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Impressive Bears’ Victory Bodes Well for 2009 Season
I realize it’s only the third game of the pre-season, but if last night’s victory over the Denver Broncos’ is any indication, the Bears should perform well once the NFL season officially begins.
What impressed me the most about last night’s effort was that the Bears’ offense, defense and special teams all contributed to the victory. It was a well-balanced effort and one that bodes well for the rest of the season, regardless how Brett Favre and the Vikings play.
Jay Cutler also proved that he is worthy of the franchise quarterback tag that many have put on him. The five-minute, 98-yard drive to end the first half was particularly impressive and showcased his leadership skills. He may have put to rest any lingering doubts people had about the Bears trading for him. Cutler also faced a hostile crowd, but managed well despite hearing a chorus of boos. If he can handle the pressure of playing in front of an angry crowd in his former home stadium, then Cutler can handle anything that comes his way.
That said, let’s not overlook the fact that the Bears did play the Denver Broncos, which proved to be a team that’s not quite ready for the regular season. Kyle Orton, the Broncos’ starting QB, left the game in the second quarter with an injured finger on his throwing hand which could affect his play down the road.
However, the Bears still have some issues in the secondary. Denver marched down the field in the third quarter to for a quick touchdown, burning a couple of Bears’ safeties in the process. And while the offensive line is much improved over last season, will it hold up after 17 weeks? Injuries are another question mark. As long as players stay healthy, the Bears could return to the playoffs as the NFC North champs.
What impressed me the most about last night’s effort was that the Bears’ offense, defense and special teams all contributed to the victory. It was a well-balanced effort and one that bodes well for the rest of the season, regardless how Brett Favre and the Vikings play.
Jay Cutler also proved that he is worthy of the franchise quarterback tag that many have put on him. The five-minute, 98-yard drive to end the first half was particularly impressive and showcased his leadership skills. He may have put to rest any lingering doubts people had about the Bears trading for him. Cutler also faced a hostile crowd, but managed well despite hearing a chorus of boos. If he can handle the pressure of playing in front of an angry crowd in his former home stadium, then Cutler can handle anything that comes his way.
That said, let’s not overlook the fact that the Bears did play the Denver Broncos, which proved to be a team that’s not quite ready for the regular season. Kyle Orton, the Broncos’ starting QB, left the game in the second quarter with an injured finger on his throwing hand which could affect his play down the road.
However, the Bears still have some issues in the secondary. Denver marched down the field in the third quarter to for a quick touchdown, burning a couple of Bears’ safeties in the process. And while the offensive line is much improved over last season, will it hold up after 17 weeks? Injuries are another question mark. As long as players stay healthy, the Bears could return to the playoffs as the NFC North champs.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Women’s Ski Jumping and Figure Skating Gain Support and Exposure
Several weeks ago in this column, I expressed hope that the International Olympic Committee would approve women’s ski jumping for the Winter Games. U.S. women ski jumpers have been fighting this uphill battle for some time. But there may be some hope on the horizon.
According to the New York Times, Jacques Rogue, president of the IOC said women’s ski jumping is being added to a Winter Youth Olympics in 2012 and has a “strong case” for being part of a future Olympics. While it maybe too late for the Vancouver Olympics in 2010, there's still hope for 2014.
In other Olympic news, NBC has extended its broadcast deal with the U.S. Figure Skating Association through the 2014 Winter Olympics in Solchi, Russia. The network will provide live coverage of the national figure skating championships and Skate America. That's good news for the sport which has had declining viewership and attendance in recent years.
Let's hope that NBC provides the coverage on its parent station and does not bury the event on its Oxygen network, like it did for the World Figure Skating Championships in Los Angeles last March. Some cable companies do not carry Oxygen, or if they do, it's at a premium, and many households don't have access to it. Despite this minor issue, the extended contract guarantees that figure skating will continue to have some exposure to American audiences.
According to the New York Times, Jacques Rogue, president of the IOC said women’s ski jumping is being added to a Winter Youth Olympics in 2012 and has a “strong case” for being part of a future Olympics. While it maybe too late for the Vancouver Olympics in 2010, there's still hope for 2014.
In other Olympic news, NBC has extended its broadcast deal with the U.S. Figure Skating Association through the 2014 Winter Olympics in Solchi, Russia. The network will provide live coverage of the national figure skating championships and Skate America. That's good news for the sport which has had declining viewership and attendance in recent years.
Let's hope that NBC provides the coverage on its parent station and does not bury the event on its Oxygen network, like it did for the World Figure Skating Championships in Los Angeles last March. Some cable companies do not carry Oxygen, or if they do, it's at a premium, and many households don't have access to it. Despite this minor issue, the extended contract guarantees that figure skating will continue to have some exposure to American audiences.
Cub’s Lee Wins Heart and Hustle Award
Chicago Cubs’ first baseman Derrek Lee has been honored with the Heart and Hustle Award, voted on by players in the Major League Baseball Alumni Association. According to MLB.com, the award is presented to the player who demonstrates “passion for the game of baseball and best embodies the values, spirit and traditions of the game.”
It’s a tremendous honor for Lee, who has been the most consistent player for the Cubs this season. On a team that has suffered a lot of injuries and distractions on and off the field, Lee is very quietly having a solid season, batting .293 with 25 homers and 86 RBIs. If Cubs’ GM Jim Hendry has any brains (and sometimes I question if he does), he should waste no time in extending Lee’s contract, which expires at the end of the 2010 season.
It’s a tremendous honor for Lee, who has been the most consistent player for the Cubs this season. On a team that has suffered a lot of injuries and distractions on and off the field, Lee is very quietly having a solid season, batting .293 with 25 homers and 86 RBIs. If Cubs’ GM Jim Hendry has any brains (and sometimes I question if he does), he should waste no time in extending Lee’s contract, which expires at the end of the 2010 season.
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Cubs’ Bradley Says Fans Verbally Abuse Him
Milton Bradley has had a rough season so far with the Cubs since signing a three-year, $30 million contract last winter. The pressure of trying to perform up to the standards of his contract must finally be getting to him. But then again, most of us knew that Bradley is a bit of a loose cannon when he arrived on the team.
This week, the Cubs’ outfielder says he has been the victim of ‘racial abuse’ by fans at Wrigley Field, according to the Chicago Tribune. But when pressed to provide examples, he declined to give specifics. He also added that this behavior has happened before and is quite common, though he gave no anecdotes to support his point.
How can any of us believe Bradley's story if he doesn’t back up his claims? I suspect that whatever Bradley hears from fans is not nearly as bad as he makes them out to be nor are the comments racially motivated. He isn’t the first Cubs player to accuse Chicago fans of racial abuse; Jacques Jones and LaTroy Hawkins also expressed their frustration with fans several years ago. Both were experiencing subpar seasons at the time.
The truth is fans are going to jeer, criticize and make fun of players at the ball park; that’s all part of the game. Most players know that and take the comments in stride.
Perhaps that’s part of Bradley’s problem; he’s paying too much attention to what’s happening in the stands and not enough attention to what’s happening on the field.
Bradley could learn a lesson or two from his teammate Alfonso Soriano, who gets booed as much as any other player and has learned from experience to simply tune out the fans. It’s time Bradley does the same.
This week, the Cubs’ outfielder says he has been the victim of ‘racial abuse’ by fans at Wrigley Field, according to the Chicago Tribune. But when pressed to provide examples, he declined to give specifics. He also added that this behavior has happened before and is quite common, though he gave no anecdotes to support his point.
How can any of us believe Bradley's story if he doesn’t back up his claims? I suspect that whatever Bradley hears from fans is not nearly as bad as he makes them out to be nor are the comments racially motivated. He isn’t the first Cubs player to accuse Chicago fans of racial abuse; Jacques Jones and LaTroy Hawkins also expressed their frustration with fans several years ago. Both were experiencing subpar seasons at the time.
The truth is fans are going to jeer, criticize and make fun of players at the ball park; that’s all part of the game. Most players know that and take the comments in stride.
Perhaps that’s part of Bradley’s problem; he’s paying too much attention to what’s happening in the stands and not enough attention to what’s happening on the field.
Bradley could learn a lesson or two from his teammate Alfonso Soriano, who gets booed as much as any other player and has learned from experience to simply tune out the fans. It’s time Bradley does the same.
Hawks’ Kane Apologizes,
The Blackhawks’ Patrick Kane and his cousin, James, pleaded guilty to a non-criminal charge of disorderly conduct today, the Associated Press reports. The judge gave them conditional discharges, meaning they can avoid further penalties if they stay out of trouble for a year and apologize to the Buffalo cabdriver they were accused of beating over cab fare.
This is a far cry from the original charges of felony assault, which a grand jury dismissed, and misdemeanor charges of assault, theft of services and harassment. Essentially, Kane and his cousin got a slap on the wrist. Kane is very lucky that he did not land in jail. He says he’s ready to move forward and putthis episode behind him, and I think most Hawks fans are too.
This is a far cry from the original charges of felony assault, which a grand jury dismissed, and misdemeanor charges of assault, theft of services and harassment. Essentially, Kane and his cousin got a slap on the wrist. Kane is very lucky that he did not land in jail. He says he’s ready to move forward and putthis episode behind him, and I think most Hawks fans are too.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Retirement Poses Difficult Transition for Athletes
Those who follow baseball may remember Doug Glanville, who played for the Chicago Cubs, Philadelphia Phillies and Texas Rangers from 1996 to 2004. He is writing a series of articles for the New York Times providing his insights into the sport.
The latest column “The Forgotten” shows how he and other athletes, like former Tennessee Titans quarterback Steve McNair, found it difficult to transition from professional sports to the real world. I think many of us assume that pro athletes have it made, that the money they made as an athlete will help them survive in retirement. That is far from the truth, writes Glanville, who describes his own struggles as he found a new life after baseball.
What I found astounding were the statistics he quoted from the Professional Sports Wives Association. More than 80 percent of athletes are divorced and are a quarter of a million dollars in debt after they retire.
I know at times it’s difficult to be sympathetic toward millionaire ball players like Alex Rodriguez who divorced his wife recently, but Glanville’s article shows that in many cases, there is often more to their personal story than what fans see or read in the paper.
The latest column “The Forgotten” shows how he and other athletes, like former Tennessee Titans quarterback Steve McNair, found it difficult to transition from professional sports to the real world. I think many of us assume that pro athletes have it made, that the money they made as an athlete will help them survive in retirement. That is far from the truth, writes Glanville, who describes his own struggles as he found a new life after baseball.
What I found astounding were the statistics he quoted from the Professional Sports Wives Association. More than 80 percent of athletes are divorced and are a quarter of a million dollars in debt after they retire.
I know at times it’s difficult to be sympathetic toward millionaire ball players like Alex Rodriguez who divorced his wife recently, but Glanville’s article shows that in many cases, there is often more to their personal story than what fans see or read in the paper.
Women's Boxing in, Softball Out of Summer Olympics
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) voted last week to include women’s boxing to the 2012 London Olympics, the New York Times reports. It also recommended golf and rugby to be added to the 2016 games. Five other sports were rejected: baseball, softball, karate, roller sports and squash.
Of the 26 sports at last year’s games in Beijing, boxing was the only one that did not include women. Many opponents feel the sport is too dangerous for women. However, by adding it to the program for 2012, one of the biggest barriers in Olympic sports has come crashing down.
Other women’s sports have already been part of the Olympic program. Women competed in judo for the first time in 1992 and in weightlifting in 2000. However, if the IOC is truly serious about including more women’s sports, then softball should have been voted back in. Softball had been part of the Olympic program since 1996 until 2004 when the IOC board voted it off.
I am still hopeful that women’s ski jumping will be added to the Winter Olympics program for 2014.
Of the 26 sports at last year’s games in Beijing, boxing was the only one that did not include women. Many opponents feel the sport is too dangerous for women. However, by adding it to the program for 2012, one of the biggest barriers in Olympic sports has come crashing down.
Other women’s sports have already been part of the Olympic program. Women competed in judo for the first time in 1992 and in weightlifting in 2000. However, if the IOC is truly serious about including more women’s sports, then softball should have been voted back in. Softball had been part of the Olympic program since 1996 until 2004 when the IOC board voted it off.
I am still hopeful that women’s ski jumping will be added to the Winter Olympics program for 2014.
Monday, August 10, 2009
Bucket List of Sports
Writers at Sports Illustrated shared their “bucket list” of sports events – events they want to see before they die. That inspired me to share my own list.
I’m proud to say I’ve witnessed several exciting sports events in my life – White Sox-Mariners playoff game in 2000; the memorable “black-out” play-in game between the White Sox and Minnesota Twins last October; the 2006 World Figure Skating championships in Calgary; 2008 and 2009 national figure skating championships in St. Paul, Minn., and Cleveland; and the second round of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament at the United Center in 2007. But there’s plenty more I want to see.
1. Kentucky Derby – Mint julep, anyone? I love a good horse race, and while I’ve been to Arlington Park Race course in suburban Chicago, it probably doesn’t compare to the tradition and excitement of the Derby.
2. Baseball World Series – I missed the opportunity to watch the White Sox in the 2005 Series, but I’m hoping for another chance.
3. Wimbledon – I watched a women’s pro tournament at the UIC Pavillion in the mid-90s, including Venus and Serena in a doubles match when they were mere teenagers. If I’m going to see a pro tournament, it might as well be the grandaddy of them all – Wimbledon.
4. NHL playoffs – With the Blackhawks reaching the Western Conference finals in the playoffs this year, my love of hockey has been reignited. With their young, talented team, there is no reason why the Hawks shouldn’t make a return trip to the playoffs over the next few seasons. The trick will be to get my hands on what is sure to be the hottest show in town.
5. Michael Phelps – As long as he continues to swim competitively, my desire to see him compete is alive and well.
6. Olympics in Chicago – If Chicago is named the host city for the 2016 Olympic Games, I will have a smorgasbord of events to choose from – diving, rowing, gymnastics, basketball. Even better would be to attend the opening ceremonies and the parade of nations.
7. Chicago Fire or Red Stars soccer – The Fire and Red Stars are Chicago’s two pro soccer teams (men’s and women’s soccer, respectively). I watched some soccer while attending a small college. The team was one of the best in the nation, having won eight NAIA titles in 13 seasons. I’m eager to see the Fire and Red Stars at Toyota Park.
8. WNBA – Rumor has it the WNBA is struggling and could be the next league to fold after the Arena Football League suspended operations last week. If that’s the case, then I should check out the improved Chicago Sky this season. Runner up: NBA playoff game featuring the Bulls. Again finding a ticket for the pro game is tricky.
9. Snowboarding – I was fascinated watching the snowboarding competition during the 2006 Torino Olympics on TV. These guys and gals look like they’re having a blast, and it must be even more fun to watch them in person.
10. Gymnastics – When I was in high school, I had to learn to do a routine on the balance beam and uneven parallel bars, and I’m not athletically inclined. I have a tremendous appreciation for what these young men and women do on these apparatuses.
I’m proud to say I’ve witnessed several exciting sports events in my life – White Sox-Mariners playoff game in 2000; the memorable “black-out” play-in game between the White Sox and Minnesota Twins last October; the 2006 World Figure Skating championships in Calgary; 2008 and 2009 national figure skating championships in St. Paul, Minn., and Cleveland; and the second round of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament at the United Center in 2007. But there’s plenty more I want to see.
1. Kentucky Derby – Mint julep, anyone? I love a good horse race, and while I’ve been to Arlington Park Race course in suburban Chicago, it probably doesn’t compare to the tradition and excitement of the Derby.
2. Baseball World Series – I missed the opportunity to watch the White Sox in the 2005 Series, but I’m hoping for another chance.
3. Wimbledon – I watched a women’s pro tournament at the UIC Pavillion in the mid-90s, including Venus and Serena in a doubles match when they were mere teenagers. If I’m going to see a pro tournament, it might as well be the grandaddy of them all – Wimbledon.
4. NHL playoffs – With the Blackhawks reaching the Western Conference finals in the playoffs this year, my love of hockey has been reignited. With their young, talented team, there is no reason why the Hawks shouldn’t make a return trip to the playoffs over the next few seasons. The trick will be to get my hands on what is sure to be the hottest show in town.
5. Michael Phelps – As long as he continues to swim competitively, my desire to see him compete is alive and well.
6. Olympics in Chicago – If Chicago is named the host city for the 2016 Olympic Games, I will have a smorgasbord of events to choose from – diving, rowing, gymnastics, basketball. Even better would be to attend the opening ceremonies and the parade of nations.
7. Chicago Fire or Red Stars soccer – The Fire and Red Stars are Chicago’s two pro soccer teams (men’s and women’s soccer, respectively). I watched some soccer while attending a small college. The team was one of the best in the nation, having won eight NAIA titles in 13 seasons. I’m eager to see the Fire and Red Stars at Toyota Park.
8. WNBA – Rumor has it the WNBA is struggling and could be the next league to fold after the Arena Football League suspended operations last week. If that’s the case, then I should check out the improved Chicago Sky this season. Runner up: NBA playoff game featuring the Bulls. Again finding a ticket for the pro game is tricky.
9. Snowboarding – I was fascinated watching the snowboarding competition during the 2006 Torino Olympics on TV. These guys and gals look like they’re having a blast, and it must be even more fun to watch them in person.
10. Gymnastics – When I was in high school, I had to learn to do a routine on the balance beam and uneven parallel bars, and I’m not athletically inclined. I have a tremendous appreciation for what these young men and women do on these apparatuses.
Monday, August 03, 2009
Kwan Won’t Compete in 2009-2010
Amidst all the excitement of the baseball trading deadline last Friday, I nearly missed a major announcement from Michelle Kwan who decided not to compete in the 2009-2010 season. Instead, she will start grad school for a master’s degree in international affairs.
The announcement comes after much speculation about whether she would try to compete for her third Olympics in Vancouver. But at age 29, she has not competed since 2006 when she had to withdraw from the Olymics in Turin because of a hip injury, so she is probably not in the best competitive condition. While Kwan has not officially announced she is retiring, her decision not to compete this coming season essentially puts an end to her illustrious figure skating career. There will never be another skater quite like her.
The announcement comes after much speculation about whether she would try to compete for her third Olympics in Vancouver. But at age 29, she has not competed since 2006 when she had to withdraw from the Olymics in Turin because of a hip injury, so she is probably not in the best competitive condition. While Kwan has not officially announced she is retiring, her decision not to compete this coming season essentially puts an end to her illustrious figure skating career. There will never be another skater quite like her.
Peavy Deal Makes a Splash
White Sox GM Kenny Williams sure likes to make a big splash at baseball’s trading deadline. Last year, for example, he picked up Ken Griffey, Jr. in a deal that left many fans scratching their heads.
This year, in a last-second deal, the Sox acquired Jake Peavy from the San Diego Padres in exchange for four young pitchers, including lefties Clayton Richard and top prospect Aaron Poreda.
Peavy refused to waive his no-trade clause two months ago in Chicago’s first bid for his services, but a lot has changed since then. The Padres have since fallen well out of contention in the NL West, and the Sox are in second place, 1 ½ games out of first place in the AL Central. It didn’t take long for Peavy to figure out that it was a waste of his time and talent to stay in San Diego.
At first glance, the deal looks very risky. Peavy has been on the DL with an ankle injury since early June and may not be available to pitch for the Sox until Sept. 1 at the earliest, if at all. In the meantime, the Sox have a gaping hole in their starting rotation with Richard gone to the Padres. The Sox will need to fill that hole with either middle reliever D.J. Carrasco or bring up someone from the minors. They have some tough series ahead, including a bear of a road trip at the end of August that takes them through Boston, New York and Minneapolis with a final stop at Wrigley Field for a make-up game against the Cubs. If the Sox can stay close to the Detroit Tigers in the divisional race and if Peavy can return to the mound by the end of August, things could get interesting in September.
The Sox also took a risk financially. Even Sox chairman Jerry Reinsdorf hesitated to sign off on this deal because of concerns about Peavy’s salary -- $8 million remaining for this season and $52 million between 2010 and 2012. As contracts for Jim Thome, Jermaine Dye and Paul Konerko expire in the next couple of years, the Sox might get a little more breathing room with their finances to take on Peavy’s salary.
Fox Sports’ Ken Rosenthal says the risk may be worth it, especially for the long term. If this deal pans out, the Sox rotation could be set for the next two years at least. Imagine a rotation that includes Peavy, Mark Buehrle, John Danks and Gavin Floyd. That’s a lineup that can compete with any team in the major leagues.
This year, in a last-second deal, the Sox acquired Jake Peavy from the San Diego Padres in exchange for four young pitchers, including lefties Clayton Richard and top prospect Aaron Poreda.
Peavy refused to waive his no-trade clause two months ago in Chicago’s first bid for his services, but a lot has changed since then. The Padres have since fallen well out of contention in the NL West, and the Sox are in second place, 1 ½ games out of first place in the AL Central. It didn’t take long for Peavy to figure out that it was a waste of his time and talent to stay in San Diego.
At first glance, the deal looks very risky. Peavy has been on the DL with an ankle injury since early June and may not be available to pitch for the Sox until Sept. 1 at the earliest, if at all. In the meantime, the Sox have a gaping hole in their starting rotation with Richard gone to the Padres. The Sox will need to fill that hole with either middle reliever D.J. Carrasco or bring up someone from the minors. They have some tough series ahead, including a bear of a road trip at the end of August that takes them through Boston, New York and Minneapolis with a final stop at Wrigley Field for a make-up game against the Cubs. If the Sox can stay close to the Detroit Tigers in the divisional race and if Peavy can return to the mound by the end of August, things could get interesting in September.
The Sox also took a risk financially. Even Sox chairman Jerry Reinsdorf hesitated to sign off on this deal because of concerns about Peavy’s salary -- $8 million remaining for this season and $52 million between 2010 and 2012. As contracts for Jim Thome, Jermaine Dye and Paul Konerko expire in the next couple of years, the Sox might get a little more breathing room with their finances to take on Peavy’s salary.
Fox Sports’ Ken Rosenthal says the risk may be worth it, especially for the long term. If this deal pans out, the Sox rotation could be set for the next two years at least. Imagine a rotation that includes Peavy, Mark Buehrle, John Danks and Gavin Floyd. That’s a lineup that can compete with any team in the major leagues.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Ortiz, Ramirez Tested Positive for PEDs
David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez, the two sluggers who led the Boston Red Sox to two world championships in 2004 and 2007, were among the 100 or so names on the list of Major League players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in 2003, according to the New York Times.
So, does this mean the Red Sox championships are tainted? Should these guys turn in their championship rings?
I can’t say I’m surprised. Ramirez has already served a 50-game suspension for violating baseball’s drug policy earlier this season. Ortiz could not have been far behind. Before 2003, Ortiz was not well-known. In 2002, the Minnesota Twins cut him after failing to trade him, but he later signed with the Red Sox, where his career and batting numbers took off. See Fox Sports’ nifty chart summarizing Ortiz’s career numbers.
I do wish these names wouldn’t be slowly and gradually leaked out to the public. With each name, I get less surprised by the results. I do think it’s time for the entire list of names to be published, so we can all put this matter behind us.
So, does this mean the Red Sox championships are tainted? Should these guys turn in their championship rings?
I can’t say I’m surprised. Ramirez has already served a 50-game suspension for violating baseball’s drug policy earlier this season. Ortiz could not have been far behind. Before 2003, Ortiz was not well-known. In 2002, the Minnesota Twins cut him after failing to trade him, but he later signed with the Red Sox, where his career and batting numbers took off. See Fox Sports’ nifty chart summarizing Ortiz’s career numbers.
I do wish these names wouldn’t be slowly and gradually leaked out to the public. With each name, I get less surprised by the results. I do think it’s time for the entire list of names to be published, so we can all put this matter behind us.
ESPN Planning Bartman Documentary
ESPN must really be scraping the bottom of the barrel for programming ideas. The sports network announced that it is planning to do a documentary about Steve Bartman for its '30 for 30' project to commemorate the network’s 30th anniversary. If you recall, Bartman is the unfortunate Cub fan who was in the wrong place at the wrong time during Game 6 of the 2003 NLCS at Wrigley Field. He attempted to catch a ball that was in foul territory at the same time that Cubs’ outfielder Moises Alou reached in to grab it. The ball bounced away instead, and Alou lost his temper. The Cubs subsequently lost the game and the series, and Bartman has been a scapegoat ever since.
I’m not sure why ESPN would want to document this story. It serves no purpose except to prolong the memory of another disappointing Cubs’ postseason. It’s time to put this story to rest for once and for all.
I’m not sure why ESPN would want to document this story. It serves no purpose except to prolong the memory of another disappointing Cubs’ postseason. It’s time to put this story to rest for once and for all.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
White Sox Trade Anderson to Boston
Brian Anderson got his wish Tuesday. The White Sox traded the underachieving outfielder to the Boston Red Sox for veteran OF Mark Kotsay. After being sent down to Triple-A Charlotte last week, Anderson asked Kenny Williams to trade him so he could have a fresh start somewhere and get more everyday playing time.
This deal was long overdue. Anderson is a solid defensive player and has a great arm, but never quite lived up to his highly touted abilities.
In the meantime, I think Kotsay is a great pickup for the Chisox that could pay dividends right away. He gives the Sox another left-handed bat in the lineup and can be used as a late-inning replacement in the outfield. Since 1998, he ranks third among outfielders with 113 assists behind Bobby Abreu and Vladimir Guerrero. He also plays first base so he can back up Paul Konerko. Most important, his lifetime batting average as a pinch-hitter is .373, an area that is sadly lacking this year for the Sox.
The Red Sox designated Kotsay for assignment last week. He started the season on the DL after back surgery, and has played in only 27 games this season. Despite the lack of playing time, I think he will fit in well on the South Side.
This deal was long overdue. Anderson is a solid defensive player and has a great arm, but never quite lived up to his highly touted abilities.
In the meantime, I think Kotsay is a great pickup for the Chisox that could pay dividends right away. He gives the Sox another left-handed bat in the lineup and can be used as a late-inning replacement in the outfield. Since 1998, he ranks third among outfielders with 113 assists behind Bobby Abreu and Vladimir Guerrero. He also plays first base so he can back up Paul Konerko. Most important, his lifetime batting average as a pinch-hitter is .373, an area that is sadly lacking this year for the Sox.
The Red Sox designated Kotsay for assignment last week. He started the season on the DL after back surgery, and has played in only 27 games this season. Despite the lack of playing time, I think he will fit in well on the South Side.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Sox’ Buehrle May Not Wait for HOF Call
Ever since Mark Buehrle’s remarkable perfect game last week, baseball analysts have been weighing in on whether the White Sox southpaw should be considered for the Baseball Hall of Fame, including reporters from the Chicago Tribune and Fox Sports. It’s still too early to say if he is worthy of consideration, but he certainly is off to a good start. At age 30, Buehrle has accomplished more in his career than most pitchers have in their entire careers.
* Pitched both a perfect game and a no-hitter, joining the elite company of Cy Young, Addie Joss, Sandy Kaufax, Jim Bunning and Randy Johnson. (Sports Illustrated has a complete list of pitchers who threw a perfect game.)
* 133 victories to date with a .591 winning percentage
* Four-time All Star
* 1 World Series title
In addition, in an era when many pitchers land on the DL with minor ailments and major injuries, Buehrle has proven to be a very durable player. Ten years into his pro career, and he’s never been on the DL (knock on wood). He throws strikes, gives you quality innings, and is a great guy to have in the clubhouse.
What is missing from his stats are a 20-win season and a Cy Young award, which some experts feel he needs to enter the Hall of Fame. Even if Buehrle did accomplish these things, would he stick around in the game long enough? Will he give the HOF a chance to call his name?
During spring training he admitted to being homesick and said would consider leaving the game when his current contract ends in 2011 to spend more time with his family. He repeated those comments last night on WBBM-TV’s local newscast. Those comments cannot be taken lightly. Buehrle does not put himself above his teammates. Nor is he the type of player who will hang around the game just to pile up victories and pad his stats.
When his contract ends in 2011, Buehrle will be only 32, still plenty of time in his major league career if he remains healthy. Hopefully, he will decide to re-sign with the Sox for a few more years. But if he doesn’t, and he has achieved his Cy Young Award and 20-win season by then, don’t be surprised if Buehrle does what few players have the courage to do – walk away from the game.
* Pitched both a perfect game and a no-hitter, joining the elite company of Cy Young, Addie Joss, Sandy Kaufax, Jim Bunning and Randy Johnson. (Sports Illustrated has a complete list of pitchers who threw a perfect game.)
* 133 victories to date with a .591 winning percentage
* Four-time All Star
* 1 World Series title
In addition, in an era when many pitchers land on the DL with minor ailments and major injuries, Buehrle has proven to be a very durable player. Ten years into his pro career, and he’s never been on the DL (knock on wood). He throws strikes, gives you quality innings, and is a great guy to have in the clubhouse.
What is missing from his stats are a 20-win season and a Cy Young award, which some experts feel he needs to enter the Hall of Fame. Even if Buehrle did accomplish these things, would he stick around in the game long enough? Will he give the HOF a chance to call his name?
During spring training he admitted to being homesick and said would consider leaving the game when his current contract ends in 2011 to spend more time with his family. He repeated those comments last night on WBBM-TV’s local newscast. Those comments cannot be taken lightly. Buehrle does not put himself above his teammates. Nor is he the type of player who will hang around the game just to pile up victories and pad his stats.
When his contract ends in 2011, Buehrle will be only 32, still plenty of time in his major league career if he remains healthy. Hopefully, he will decide to re-sign with the Sox for a few more years. But if he doesn’t, and he has achieved his Cy Young Award and 20-win season by then, don’t be surprised if Buehrle does what few players have the courage to do – walk away from the game.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Halladay Trade Not Likely
I’m beginning to think Toronto Blue Jays GM J.P. Ricciardi is just yanking everyone’s chain. Ricciardi has set a July 28 trade deadline for a possible deal for All-Star pitcher Roy Halladay (even though the MLB deadline is July 31) and he says he has yet to receive an appropriate trade offer and expects Halladay to remain with the team.
He’s probably right. But then that was probably his plan all along. Ever since he announced that he was willing to trade Halladay, Ricciardi seemed more interested in “kicking tires” than making a deal. Ricciardi is like a homeowner who wants to test the waters of the housing market by putting his house up for sale just to see what kind of offers he’ll get. Can anyone take Ricciardi seriously? And why would he make such a huge announcement over wanting to trade Halladay? If he wants to trade his ace, wouldn’t it be easier to work a deal under the radar without all the fanfare? No need for all the smoke and mirrors.
Why trade Halladay at all? It’s not as if the Jays have been a bottom-dwelling team these past few seasons. Currently, they are in fourth place, 10 games behind the division-leading Yankees. The Jays have strong pitching, and some good young players who will help this team down the road. They just have the misfortune of playing in the highly competitive AL East with the Yankees, Red Sox and Rays.
Two things I know about baseball: you never trade away your best player, and you never give away the farm. Wouldn’t you rather keep your star player and rebuild around him? The Jays can be even more competitive by keeping Halladay and developing the young players they have.
As for potential buyers, I don’t see any team currently in contention that is so desperate for a starter that they are willing to give up several of their best prospects. Ricciardi wants too much in return for his ace. Come August 1, Halladay will remain a Jay.
He’s probably right. But then that was probably his plan all along. Ever since he announced that he was willing to trade Halladay, Ricciardi seemed more interested in “kicking tires” than making a deal. Ricciardi is like a homeowner who wants to test the waters of the housing market by putting his house up for sale just to see what kind of offers he’ll get. Can anyone take Ricciardi seriously? And why would he make such a huge announcement over wanting to trade Halladay? If he wants to trade his ace, wouldn’t it be easier to work a deal under the radar without all the fanfare? No need for all the smoke and mirrors.
Why trade Halladay at all? It’s not as if the Jays have been a bottom-dwelling team these past few seasons. Currently, they are in fourth place, 10 games behind the division-leading Yankees. The Jays have strong pitching, and some good young players who will help this team down the road. They just have the misfortune of playing in the highly competitive AL East with the Yankees, Red Sox and Rays.
Two things I know about baseball: you never trade away your best player, and you never give away the farm. Wouldn’t you rather keep your star player and rebuild around him? The Jays can be even more competitive by keeping Halladay and developing the young players they have.
As for potential buyers, I don’t see any team currently in contention that is so desperate for a starter that they are willing to give up several of their best prospects. Ricciardi wants too much in return for his ace. Come August 1, Halladay will remain a Jay.
Monday, July 20, 2009
ESPN Expands Hometown Coverage
I guess it’s not enough for ESPN to be a global presence in 200 countries and cover college sports as well as the pros. The New York Times reports that ESPN is expanding its reach into several local markets after a test run in Chicago has shown that the sports network can compete with local broadcast outlets . Since its launch in April, ESPNChicago.com has become the city’s top sports site, attracting more than 590,000 unique visitors in June, according to comScore, an Internet measurement company. The network plans to add three more sites in Dallas, New York and Los Angeles beginning later this fall and early 2010. The Chicago site covers the city’s seven professional sports teams and sports at nine area colleges. It plans to add high schools sports coverage.
ESPN entering the local sports market is like a major big box retailer opening up a store in neighborhood with independent retailers, only to see those smaller businesses go out of business. Seems kind of unfair, like a big bully picking on the smaller kids on the school playground. Granted, ESPN has the staff, the money and the branding behind them. It’ll be difficult for any smaller site to compete at their level. Sadly, as ESPN gains a stronger foothold in localized sports coverage, look for smaller sites to fall by the wayside.
ESPN entering the local sports market is like a major big box retailer opening up a store in neighborhood with independent retailers, only to see those smaller businesses go out of business. Seems kind of unfair, like a big bully picking on the smaller kids on the school playground. Granted, ESPN has the staff, the money and the branding behind them. It’ll be difficult for any smaller site to compete at their level. Sadly, as ESPN gains a stronger foothold in localized sports coverage, look for smaller sites to fall by the wayside.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
The Hawks’ Kids Are Alright
The Who’s classic tune “The Kids Are Alright” has been playing in my head, ever since the Chicago Blackhawks defeated the favored Vancouver Canucks Monday night to advance to the NHL Western Conference Finals for the first time since 1995. The song seems to be a fitting tribute to the young, upstart Hawks, who are the youngest team in the league at an average age of 25.5. But don’t let their youth fool you. They are playing at a level well beyond their years.
I don’t think anyone expected the Hawks to get as far as they have this postseason. With each victory, they are discovering just how good they are and what their potential is. It's like watching a child learn to crawl and then begin to walk -- you want to applaud every step he takes. With each success, the Hawks are beginning to believe more in themselves. Belief plus talent can be a potent combination for success. Anything is possible. It is not only magical to watch for fans, it may be dangerous for their opponents.
For many Chicago fans, this playoff run by the Hawks is a dream come true. If that’s the case, I’m not ready to wake up from this dream just yet.
I don’t think anyone expected the Hawks to get as far as they have this postseason. With each victory, they are discovering just how good they are and what their potential is. It's like watching a child learn to crawl and then begin to walk -- you want to applaud every step he takes. With each success, the Hawks are beginning to believe more in themselves. Belief plus talent can be a potent combination for success. Anything is possible. It is not only magical to watch for fans, it may be dangerous for their opponents.
For many Chicago fans, this playoff run by the Hawks is a dream come true. If that’s the case, I’m not ready to wake up from this dream just yet.
Monday, May 04, 2009
Skate Canada Wants to Change Figure Skating Image
With the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics less than a year away, Skate Canada has decided it’s time to change the image of figure skating. With declining attendance and television ratings, Canadian skating officials believe that rebranding the sport as more masculine will draw new fans from hockey, football and baseball, according to the Wall Street Journal. Officials also want their male skaters to refrain from wearing sequins, ruffles and other frills in favor of simpler, more uniform outfits. They have also requested their skaters to talk up their injuries and training regimen to showcase how tough and macho the sport is.
It is no surprise that these rebranding efforts have outraged gay advocacy groups, who call it an attack on skating’s sizable gay audience. And the controversy made its way “World News with Charles Gibson” on ABC-TV.
This controversy has been going on for decades, and Skate Canada has always been somewhat sensitive to this issue. After all, it was a Canadian skater, Toller Cranston, along with Great Britain’s John Curry, who routinely wore frilly costumes in the late 1970s to express the artistry of their programs. Then along comes Kurt Browning in the early 1990s, who performs the first quadruple jump in competition and skated to rock music – moves that helped make the sport more macho.
The truth is both Skate Canada and gay advocacy groups are overreacting. This is not an attack on any particular audience, but on the sport’s artistry.
While I can understand Skate Canada’s desire to expand their fan base, it is taking the wrong approach. They can call the sport anything they want and they can try to change people’s perception of it, but they cannot change the reality of it – that it is a beautiful but physically demanding sport that requires athletes to skate to music. The sport will never draw fans from more aggressive, macho sports like hockey and football – they represent two different fan bases.
While I am not a fan of some of the frilly, sequined costumes that some of the male skaters choose to wear for their programs – I think they tend to distract from the program rather than enhance it – it’s unrealistic to expect male skaters to adhere to a more uniform look. Ultimately, the costume decision should be left to the individual skater and his coaches with the music and program in mind.
It is no surprise that these rebranding efforts have outraged gay advocacy groups, who call it an attack on skating’s sizable gay audience. And the controversy made its way “World News with Charles Gibson” on ABC-TV.
This controversy has been going on for decades, and Skate Canada has always been somewhat sensitive to this issue. After all, it was a Canadian skater, Toller Cranston, along with Great Britain’s John Curry, who routinely wore frilly costumes in the late 1970s to express the artistry of their programs. Then along comes Kurt Browning in the early 1990s, who performs the first quadruple jump in competition and skated to rock music – moves that helped make the sport more macho.
The truth is both Skate Canada and gay advocacy groups are overreacting. This is not an attack on any particular audience, but on the sport’s artistry.
While I can understand Skate Canada’s desire to expand their fan base, it is taking the wrong approach. They can call the sport anything they want and they can try to change people’s perception of it, but they cannot change the reality of it – that it is a beautiful but physically demanding sport that requires athletes to skate to music. The sport will never draw fans from more aggressive, macho sports like hockey and football – they represent two different fan bases.
While I am not a fan of some of the frilly, sequined costumes that some of the male skaters choose to wear for their programs – I think they tend to distract from the program rather than enhance it – it’s unrealistic to expect male skaters to adhere to a more uniform look. Ultimately, the costume decision should be left to the individual skater and his coaches with the music and program in mind.
Bulls Look Ahead After First-Round Defeat
Most people expected the Bulls-Celtics series to be a yawner and a laugher. Instead, it turned into one of the most compelling and thrilling playoff contests in recent memory. Overall, the teams played seven overtimes during the series, including two overtimes in game 4 and three in game 6. After the thrill ride during the first six games, Game 7 seemed anticlimactic, with the Celtics winning by a 10-point margin.
The seventh-seeded Bulls pushed the Celtics to the limit and played with an intensity no one expected. In the end, the Celtics endured, thanks to playoff experience, home court advantage, and a little luck. If the Bulls finish off Games 2 and/or 5, they – not the Celtics -- would be preparing to face the Orlando Magic in the second round rather than packing up for the summer.
I doubt the Celtics will go much further than the second round. These overtime games exposed several weaknesses – age, slower legs, and a weak bench. Without Kevin Garnett, they are simply an above average team.
The Bulls, on the other hand, showed what a gutsy bunch of players they are. They will lose some players during the off season, most likely Ben Gordon who becomes a free agent. And rookie head coach Vinny Del Negro made a few mistakes along the way, but proved that he’s worth keeping around next season.
The Bulls may have lost the series, but they achieved a moral victory. And that’s something they can build on for next year.
The seventh-seeded Bulls pushed the Celtics to the limit and played with an intensity no one expected. In the end, the Celtics endured, thanks to playoff experience, home court advantage, and a little luck. If the Bulls finish off Games 2 and/or 5, they – not the Celtics -- would be preparing to face the Orlando Magic in the second round rather than packing up for the summer.
I doubt the Celtics will go much further than the second round. These overtime games exposed several weaknesses – age, slower legs, and a weak bench. Without Kevin Garnett, they are simply an above average team.
The Bulls, on the other hand, showed what a gutsy bunch of players they are. They will lose some players during the off season, most likely Ben Gordon who becomes a free agent. And rookie head coach Vinny Del Negro made a few mistakes along the way, but proved that he’s worth keeping around next season.
The Bulls may have lost the series, but they achieved a moral victory. And that’s something they can build on for next year.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Blackhawks Host Beard-a-thon
In one of the most innovative promotions I’ve ever seen, the Chicago Blackhawks are encouraging fans to put down their razors and grow beards to support the team and raise money for Blackhawk Charities. Those of us who are follically challenged can sponsor a friend, rate the beards of competitors, or build one online. To learn more, check out Beardathon.com.
Bears Featured in Prime Time in ‘09
The networks must be pleased as punch that the Chicago Bears’ acquired QB Jay Cutler. Why else would the Bears be featured in five prime time games next season, including the season opener against the Packers in Green Bay?
Here’s the schedule, and my early season predictions for each matchup. Of course, with injuries and other intangible factors, things could change (and they usually do). But at this point, the Bears should have a record of 11-5 to win the NFC North division.
Sun, Sept. 13 at Green Bay Packers NBC 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Sept. 20 vs. Pittsburgh Steelers CBS 3:15 p.m. Lose
Sun, Sept. 27 at Seattle Seahawks FOX 3:05 p.m. Win
Sun, Oct. 4 vs. Detroit Lions FOX noon Win
Sun, Oct. 11 Bye Week
Sun, Oct. 18 at Atlanta Falcons NBC 7:20 p.m. Lose
Sun, Oct. 25 at Cincinnati Bengals FOX noon Win
Sun, Nov. 1 vs. Cleveland Browns CBS noon Win
Sun, Nov. 8 vs. Arizona Cardinals FOX noon Lost
Thu, Nov. 12 at San Francisco NFLN 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Nov. 22 vs. Philadelphia Eagles NBC 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Nov. 29 at Minnesota Vikings FOX noon Lose
Sun, Dec. 6 vs. St. Louis Rams FOX noon Win
Sun, Dec. 13 vs. Green Bay Packers FOX noon Win
Sun, Dec. 20 at Baltimore Ravens FOX noon Lose
Mon, Dec. 28 vs. Minnesota Vikings ESPN 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Jan. 3 at Detroit Lions FOX noon Win
The Bears start training camp on Friday, July 31. The preseason schedule is as follows:
Aug. 15 at Buffalo, 6 p.m.
Aug 22 New York Giants, 7 p.m.
Aug. 30, at Denver, 7 p.m.
Sept: 3 Cleveland, 7 p.m.
Here’s the schedule, and my early season predictions for each matchup. Of course, with injuries and other intangible factors, things could change (and they usually do). But at this point, the Bears should have a record of 11-5 to win the NFC North division.
Sun, Sept. 13 at Green Bay Packers NBC 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Sept. 20 vs. Pittsburgh Steelers CBS 3:15 p.m. Lose
Sun, Sept. 27 at Seattle Seahawks FOX 3:05 p.m. Win
Sun, Oct. 4 vs. Detroit Lions FOX noon Win
Sun, Oct. 11 Bye Week
Sun, Oct. 18 at Atlanta Falcons NBC 7:20 p.m. Lose
Sun, Oct. 25 at Cincinnati Bengals FOX noon Win
Sun, Nov. 1 vs. Cleveland Browns CBS noon Win
Sun, Nov. 8 vs. Arizona Cardinals FOX noon Lost
Thu, Nov. 12 at San Francisco NFLN 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Nov. 22 vs. Philadelphia Eagles NBC 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Nov. 29 at Minnesota Vikings FOX noon Lose
Sun, Dec. 6 vs. St. Louis Rams FOX noon Win
Sun, Dec. 13 vs. Green Bay Packers FOX noon Win
Sun, Dec. 20 at Baltimore Ravens FOX noon Lose
Mon, Dec. 28 vs. Minnesota Vikings ESPN 7:20 p.m. Win
Sun, Jan. 3 at Detroit Lions FOX noon Win
The Bears start training camp on Friday, July 31. The preseason schedule is as follows:
Aug. 15 at Buffalo, 6 p.m.
Aug 22 New York Giants, 7 p.m.
Aug. 30, at Denver, 7 p.m.
Sept: 3 Cleveland, 7 p.m.
Sunday, April 05, 2009
Can Cutler Make the Cut?
I'm probably one of the few people in Chicago who did not jump for joy when the Bears traded for Jay Cutler last week. In the trade, the Bears gave up an awful lot -- perhaps too much --including QB Kyle Orton, two first round draft picks and a third round draft pick.
Sure, Cutler is a Pro Bowl quarterback with a career 87.0 rating, higher than any other quarterback in Bears' history. But I'm not convinced that he will have the immediate impact on the team that fans expect. He's coming from a more offensively focused AFC team, the Denver Broncos, with a better corps of receivers and a better offensive game plan. The Bears have always been, and always will be, a defensive team that depends on the running game. It makes me wonder how Cutler will fit in to the Bears' offensive scheme. The Bears' offense has been rather suspect in recent years, and that is not a knock on Kyle Orton, who probably would have performed better if he had better receivers and a younger, healthier offensive line in front of him.
Sow while Cutler is a definite upgrade at the QB position, I think it's unfair to expect him to perform with the same success as he had in Denver. The Bears must also upgrade the offensive line and the receivers. And the addition of offensive tackle Orlando Pace, who was acquired on the same day as the Cutler trade, should help. Still there's work to do for the Bears, and they know it.
Cutler's stats are wonderful, there's no doubt about that. But let's not expect miracles just yet. It may take two or three seasons for the remaining pieces of the puzzle to fall into place.
Sure, Cutler is a Pro Bowl quarterback with a career 87.0 rating, higher than any other quarterback in Bears' history. But I'm not convinced that he will have the immediate impact on the team that fans expect. He's coming from a more offensively focused AFC team, the Denver Broncos, with a better corps of receivers and a better offensive game plan. The Bears have always been, and always will be, a defensive team that depends on the running game. It makes me wonder how Cutler will fit in to the Bears' offensive scheme. The Bears' offense has been rather suspect in recent years, and that is not a knock on Kyle Orton, who probably would have performed better if he had better receivers and a younger, healthier offensive line in front of him.
Sow while Cutler is a definite upgrade at the QB position, I think it's unfair to expect him to perform with the same success as he had in Denver. The Bears must also upgrade the offensive line and the receivers. And the addition of offensive tackle Orlando Pace, who was acquired on the same day as the Cutler trade, should help. Still there's work to do for the Bears, and they know it.
Cutler's stats are wonderful, there's no doubt about that. But let's not expect miracles just yet. It may take two or three seasons for the remaining pieces of the puzzle to fall into place.
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
The World Title That Almost Wasn't
I was thrilled to see Naperville native Evan Lysacek win the gold medal at the World Figure Skating Championships last week in Los Angeles (no, I was not there in person, but watched it on the Oxygen network). Both his short program and free skate were brilliant.
And to think, Lysacek may not have won this title had it not been for Johnnie Weir.
By International Skating Union rules, the top two placements by American skaters at the world championships must total 13 or less to keep three spots on the team. Weir's third-place finish at the 2008 championships combined with a 10th-place finish by Steven Carriere equaled 13, which gave the U.S. three spots for this year's team.
Imagine what might have happened if they had earned only two spots. The U.S. men's team would have consisted of Jeremy Abbott and Brandon Mroz, who finished first and second at the U.S. championships in January. Lysacek, who finished third at nationals, would not have made the team and the world title would have gone to someone else.
Sobering thought, isn't it?
And to think, Lysacek may not have won this title had it not been for Johnnie Weir.
By International Skating Union rules, the top two placements by American skaters at the world championships must total 13 or less to keep three spots on the team. Weir's third-place finish at the 2008 championships combined with a 10th-place finish by Steven Carriere equaled 13, which gave the U.S. three spots for this year's team.
Imagine what might have happened if they had earned only two spots. The U.S. men's team would have consisted of Jeremy Abbott and Brandon Mroz, who finished first and second at the U.S. championships in January. Lysacek, who finished third at nationals, would not have made the team and the world title would have gone to someone else.
Sobering thought, isn't it?
High Prices Are Baseball Fans Top Concern
After an extended absence, I am back at the helm of Woman's Eye on Sports. I was dealing with a minor health issue last spring, and I must confess, I lost interest in my blog during my recuperation. But I am back, I'm in good health, and I'm ready to provide news and insights about the sports world.
It seems every time I go to a baseball game, I’m spending more for tickets and concessions. Thank goodness I take public transportation to the games, or I’d really be in the red.
I’m not alone. A new Associated Press-Knowledge Networks poll finds that 45 percent of baseball fans surveyed said they are most concerned about the high price of attending a game.
In these tough economic times, many folks simply do not have the discretionary income to pay for an evening at the ball park. Almost 60 percent of fans surveyed said that going to a game was more expensive than other types of entertainment they consider, yet there was no indication that they would stay home because of the prices. Only 11 percent who attended a game in 2008 said they would not go this season. With the start of the baseball season less than a week away, it remains to be seen if these higher prices will keep people at home.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)